To help, we have worked with many of you to understand what obstacles stand in your way and what situations you seek. The result of our partnerships is Discovery NM/CT 670 CZT. We hope you see it as we do, as much more than another imaging product. We see it as a tool to help you to bring your theories to life.
1In clinical practice, the use of Discovery NM/CT 670 CZT may improve lesion detectability depending on the clinical task, patient size, anatomical location and clinical practice. A consultation with a radiologist and a physicist should be made to determine the appropriate dose or scan time to obtain diagnostic image quality for the particular clinical task.
2Together with Clarity 2D and Evolution7 and compared to Discovery NM/CT 670 Pro/ES/DR without Clarity 2D and Evolution7. As demonstrated in phantom testing using NEMA IEC Body Phantom.
3Together with Clarity 2D & Evolution7. Compared to typical 15 minute scan on Discovery NM/CT 670 Pro/ES/DR without Clarity 2D & Evolution7.
4Demonstrated in phantom testing using NEMA IEC Body Phantom at 50% scan times with Evolution7. Compared to Discovery NM/CT 670 Pro/ES/DR.
5In clinical practice, the use of ASiR may reduce CT patient dose depending on the clinical task, patient size, anatomical location and clinical practice. A consultation with a radiologist and a physicist should be made to determine the appropriate dose to obtain diagnostic image quality for the particular clinical task.
6In clinical practice, the use of Discovery NM/CT 670 CZT may improve quantitation of lesions larger than 5.5mL, depending on the clinical task, patient size, anatomical location and clinical practice. A consultation with a radiologist and a physicist should be made to determine the appropriate dose or scan time to obtain the claimed quantitation accuracy for the particular clinical task.
7In clinical practice, Evolution options7a (Evolution for Bone, Evolution for Cardiac, Evolution for Bone Planar) and Evolution Toolkit7b are recommended for use following consultation of a Nuclear Medicine physician, physicist and/or application specialist to determine the appropriate dose or scan time reduction to obtain diagnostic image quality for a particular clinical task, depending on the protocol adopted by the clinical site.
7aEvolution Options – Evolution claims are supported by simulation of count statistics using default factory protocols and imaging of 99mTc based radiotracers with LEHR collimator on anthropomorphic phantom or realistic NCAT – SIMSET phantom followed by quantitative and qualitative images comparison.
7bEvolution Toolkit – Evolution Toolkit claims are supported by simulation of full count statistics using lesion simulation phantom images based on various radiotracers and collimators and by showing that SPECT image quality reconstructed with Evolution Toolkit provide equivalent clinical information but have better signal-to-noise, contrast, and lesion resolution compare to the images reconstructed with FBP/OSEM.